淺談否定副詞“不”和“沒”的區(qū)別

淺談否定副詞“不”和“沒”的區(qū)別

摘   要

否定副詞“不”和“沒”的語義特征導致了2者的用法不同，特別是“不”與“沒”在表時上有很大差異。同時2者的差別還體現(xiàn)在與現(xiàn)代漢語中表示體范疇的詞組合能力上。
“不”和“沒”的區(qū)別并非2者是否受時間因素制約的問題，也并非單純的語義問題，而是1個涉及時、體、語義和語境等多種因素的復雜問題。所以單純從語義角度去解釋，有些問題仍然得不到令人信服的答案。本文將從“不”與“沒”與謂詞組合能力，以及2者的表時差異，表體差異3個角度，比較“不”與“沒”的不同。另外本文還將結(jié)合具體的語境對副詞“不”和“沒”的區(qū)別進行進1步探討。
關(guān)鍵詞：“不” ；“沒” ；句法功能； 語義特征
 

ABSTRACT

The semantic feature of negative adverb “bu” and “mei” causes the usage of this two words different, especially when they express tense.  At the same time， their differences also reflect in ability of combine with words which express “aspect” in modern Chinese.
The difference between “bu” and “mei” is not a simple problem of whether they have been restricted by tense factory, and also not simple semantic feature problem, but a complicated problem that involves various factors, such as tense, aspect, and the language context. So explain simply, some questions can not still get the convincing answer in terms of semanteme. This text will compare “bu” and “mei” in three respects: the ability of combine with predicate word, different usage when they express “tens”, different usage when they express “aspect”. In addition, this text will also combine the concrete language context to analyse the further differences of the adverbial words “bu” and “mei”.
Key words: “bu”; “mei”; Function of the sentence structure; Semantic feature

 
 

【淺談否定副詞“不”和“沒”的區(qū)別】相關(guān)文章：

淺談應(yīng)用化學和材料化學的區(qū)別07-26

淺談私立和公立幼兒園的管理區(qū)別和方法06-10

淺談舞蹈形象和意境04-12

淺談教育英文和中文06-16

淺談當代教育和教育目的06-15

任務(wù)書和開題報告區(qū)別02-23

淺談美式英語的起源發(fā)展和特征論文04-27

淺談美術(shù)教育的目的和作用論文（精選7篇）06-07

國際私法和國際經(jīng)濟法的聯(lián)系與區(qū)別02-23

淺談旅游資源的開發(fā)和旅游環(huán)境的保護范文09-23