• <sub id="h4knl"><ol id="h4knl"></ol></sub>
    <sup id="h4knl"></sup>
      <sub id="h4knl"></sub>

      <sub id="h4knl"><ol id="h4knl"><em id="h4knl"></em></ol></sub><s id="h4knl"></s>
      1. <strong id="h4knl"></strong>

      2. GMAT優秀作文示例

        時間:2021-01-30 20:43:35 gmat考試 我要投稿

        GMAT優秀作文示例

          The following appeared in the editorial section of a newspaper in the country of West Cambria.

        GMAT優秀作文示例

          The practice of officially changing speed limits on the highwayswhether by increasing or decreasing themis a dangerous one. Consider what happened over the past decade whenever neighboring East Cambria changed its speed limits: an average of 3 percent more automobile accidents occurred during the week following the change than had occurred during the week preceding iteven when the speed limit was lowered. This statistic shows that the change in speed limit adversely affected the alertness of drivers.

          Discuss how well reasoned... etc.

          This editorial asserts that West Cambria should not change its highway speed limits because such changes adversely affect driver alertness and are therefore dangerous. To support this claim, the editorial cites statistics indicating that whenever East Cambria changed its speed limits, an average of 3 percent more automobile accidents occurred during the week after the change than during the week preceding it, even when the speed limit was lowered. As it stands, this argument suffers from three critical flaws.

          First, it is unlikely that the brief one-week periods under comparison are representative of longer time periods. A difference of only 3 percent during one particular week can easily be accounted for by other factors, such as heavy holiday traffic or bad weather, or by problems with reporting or sampling. Had the editorial indicated that several speed-limit changes in East Cambria contributed to the statistic, the argument would be more convincing; but for all we know, the statistic is based on only one such change. In any event, a one-week period is too brief to be representative because it is likely that accidents will occur more frequently immediately following the change, while people adjust to the new limit, than over the longer term when drivers have become accustomed to the change.

        【GMAT優秀作文示例】相關文章:

        GMAT作文示例09-26

        GMAT優秀作文07-20

        GMAT優秀作文參考10-07

        GMAT優秀作文范文10-06

        GMAT優秀作文推薦10-06

        GMAT優秀精選作文10-03

        GMAT優秀作文water10-02

        GMAT優秀作文模板10-01

        GMAT優秀英語作文09-30

        国产高潮无套免费视频_久久九九兔免费精品6_99精品热6080YY久久_国产91久久久久久无码
      3. <sub id="h4knl"><ol id="h4knl"></ol></sub>
        <sup id="h4knl"></sup>
          <sub id="h4knl"></sub>

          <sub id="h4knl"><ol id="h4knl"><em id="h4knl"></em></ol></sub><s id="h4knl"></s>
          1. <strong id="h4knl"></strong>

          2. 日韩一区二区三区在线视频 | 视频一区二区三区久久 | 中文字幕欧美三级 | 欧美一区二区三区免费A级视频 | 一级午夜福利不卡片在线69网 | 久久综合亚洲色社区 |

            GMAT優秀作文示例

              The following appeared in the editorial section of a newspaper in the country of West Cambria.

            GMAT優秀作文示例

              The practice of officially changing speed limits on the highwayswhether by increasing or decreasing themis a dangerous one. Consider what happened over the past decade whenever neighboring East Cambria changed its speed limits: an average of 3 percent more automobile accidents occurred during the week following the change than had occurred during the week preceding iteven when the speed limit was lowered. This statistic shows that the change in speed limit adversely affected the alertness of drivers.

              Discuss how well reasoned... etc.

              This editorial asserts that West Cambria should not change its highway speed limits because such changes adversely affect driver alertness and are therefore dangerous. To support this claim, the editorial cites statistics indicating that whenever East Cambria changed its speed limits, an average of 3 percent more automobile accidents occurred during the week after the change than during the week preceding it, even when the speed limit was lowered. As it stands, this argument suffers from three critical flaws.

              First, it is unlikely that the brief one-week periods under comparison are representative of longer time periods. A difference of only 3 percent during one particular week can easily be accounted for by other factors, such as heavy holiday traffic or bad weather, or by problems with reporting or sampling. Had the editorial indicated that several speed-limit changes in East Cambria contributed to the statistic, the argument would be more convincing; but for all we know, the statistic is based on only one such change. In any event, a one-week period is too brief to be representative because it is likely that accidents will occur more frequently immediately following the change, while people adjust to the new limit, than over the longer term when drivers have become accustomed to the change.

            【GMAT優秀作文示例】相關文章:

            GMAT作文示例09-26

            GMAT優秀作文07-20

            GMAT優秀作文參考10-07

            GMAT優秀作文范文10-06

            GMAT優秀作文推薦10-06

            GMAT優秀精選作文10-03

            GMAT優秀作文water10-02

            GMAT優秀作文模板10-01

            GMAT優秀英語作文09-30